If I am to select a single
American president to be the greatest, first I have to examine the very concept
of „greatness“. The greatness is of course not an objective, scientific term,
that could be reduced to numbers or neutral factual observations. Even though
it would be unwise to ignore the facts entirely, since they can form a solid
basis for evaluation and serve as a fundamental qualification, the greatness is
essentially a matter of subjective values. A man can be „great“ only from a
certain perspective and to some person or people. In regards to politics, the
greatness is most often judged from the historical, personal and national
perspectives. Objectively speaking, these perspectives normally entail
significant factors like president’s concrete accomplishments, prosperity of
the USA during his term, military victories, magnitude and scope of his vision,
his legacy, renown and importance, strength of his character, his charisma and
rhetoric skills or his level of patriotism, decisiveness and resolve. I listed
these mostly objective factors in no particular order, since their relative
importance varies, depending on who is assessing it. At this point, I need to
decide, who’s perspective and what measure do I want to adopt.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Flimsy Logic of Science
If you dare to believe anything at all beyond the strict boundaries of so called good science, it may have happened to you that a self-proclaimed sceptic/atheist/scientist disregarded and invalidated your whole life's experience as well as your person by spouting a single catchphrase. Let's look at some of those popular self-evident scientific truths about our reality a little closer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)