If I am to select a single
American president to be the greatest, first I have to examine the very concept
of „greatness“. The greatness is of course not an objective, scientific term,
that could be reduced to numbers or neutral factual observations. Even though
it would be unwise to ignore the facts entirely, since they can form a solid
basis for evaluation and serve as a fundamental qualification, the greatness is
essentially a matter of subjective values. A man can be „great“ only from a
certain perspective and to some person or people. In regards to politics, the
greatness is most often judged from the historical, personal and national
perspectives. Objectively speaking, these perspectives normally entail
significant factors like president’s concrete accomplishments, prosperity of
the USA during his term, military victories, magnitude and scope of his vision,
his legacy, renown and importance, strength of his character, his charisma and
rhetoric skills or his level of patriotism, decisiveness and resolve. I listed
these mostly objective factors in no particular order, since their relative
importance varies, depending on who is assessing it. At this point, I need to
decide, who’s perspective and what measure do I want to adopt.
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Why Barrack Hussein Obama Won the 2012 American Presidential Election
The new president of the United States of America is known at last – it is the one that had already spent one term in the office, mister Barrack Hussein Obama. Many people, most of all probably American Republicans, are now asking these questions above all others: Why? How did that happen? Where did we go wrong? There undeniably was huge amount of effort put into this year’s presidential campaigns for both candindates, as well as a number of other potential candidates from the GOP primaries. Once again, the funding grew to historic heights and the intensity of coverage broke new grounds, extremes and records. Neither party could be faulted for not trying hard enough, but effort itself most certainly isn’t the only factor at play here – human (in)decision (as it was jokingly called by Daily Show’s John Stewart) can be affected by everything from gaffes to weather. There are of course more rational suspects as well, like presidential achievements or lack therof, proposed ideologies and solutions, personal integrity of candidates and performances of their running mates, the nature of media coverage, performance in debates, party unity and support or the successful fundraising efforts combined with efficient spending, and possibly even more. In this paper I will try to assess, which of these factors (if any) seem to have had significant influence on the end result of this almost-neverending election (or as it once again called John Stewart, The Democalypse 2012).
Saturday, October 20, 2012
The US of A - A Land of Two People
Not that I would try to be up to speed on whatever happens in all the rest of the world all the time, but one event in particular is extremely hard to ignore - the American kingly elections. What I haven't figured out yet is why they keep calling their kings presidents.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)